Monday, 2 February 2015

People are quicker to dismiss evidence from psychology than neuroscience

Imagine a politician from your party is in trouble for alleged misdemeanours. He's been assessed by an expert who says he likely has early-stage Alzheimer's. If this diagnosis is correct, your politician will have to resign, and he'll be replaced by a candidate from an opposing party.

This was the scenario presented to participants in a new study by Geoffrey Munro and Cynthia Munro. A vital twist was that half of the 106 student participants read a version of the story in which the dementia expert based his diagnosis on detailed cognitive tests; the other half read a version in which he used a structural MRI brain scan. All other story details were matched, such as the expert's years of experience in the field, and the detail provided for the different techniques he used.

Overall, the students found the MRI evidence more convincing than the cognitive tests. For example, 69.8 per cent of those given the MRI scenario said the evidence the politician had Alzheimer's was strong and convincing, whereas only 39.6 per cent of students given the cognitive tests scenario said the same. MRI data was also seen to be more objective, valid and reliable. Focusing on just those students in both conditions who showed scepticism, over 15 per cent who read the cognitive tests scenario mentioned the unreliability of the evidence; none of the students given the MRI scenario cited this reason.

In reality, a diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's will always be made with cognitive tests, with brain scans used to rule out other explanations for any observed test impairments. The researchers said their results are indicative of naive faith in the trustworthiness of brain imaging data. "When one contrasts the very detailed manuals accompanying cognitive tests to the absences of formalised operational criteria to guide the clinical interpretation of structural brain MRI in diagnosing disease, the perception that brain MRI is somehow immune to problems of reliability becomes even more perplexing," they said.

What about the students with a very strong political identity for whom the diagnostic evidence was therefore particularly unwelcome? The researchers found that the gap between the perception of MRI and cognitive testing was largest for this group. This is because, when the students were highly motivated to disbelieve the diagnosis of Alzheimer's, those told about the cognitive tests were very dismissive, but those told about the MRI scans showed similar levels of trust to their less partisan peers. The authors said this suggests we are more willing to discount unwelcome psychological evidence than we are to discount brain-based evidence.

These new results add to past findings showing people's bias for neuroscience and other "hard" sciences and against psychology. For example, medical students think their psychology lectures are "soft and fluffy"; students think psychology is less important than the other natural scienceschildren rate psychological questions as easier than chemistry or biology questions; and expert testimony supporting an insanity defence is seen as less convincing when delivered by a psychologist than a psychiatrist. Another line of research suggests people are particularly influenced by images of brain scans, although recent attempts have failed to replicate this finding.

The researchers called for their work to be extended into other contexts, and for the allure of neuroscience to be probed more deeply. "The need for the general public to accurately evaluate the scientific methods used by psychologists is especially relevant to real-world situations," they said, "in which strongly held values, beliefs, or identification with specific groups renders people particularly likely to discount psychological evidence."

_________________________________ ResearchBlogging.org

Munro, G., & Munro, C. (2014). “Soft” Versus “Hard” Psychological Science: Biased Evaluations of Scientific Evidence That Threatens or Supports a Strongly Held Political Identity Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36 (6), 533-543 DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2014.960080

--further reading--
Commentary on this paper from the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology
When our beliefs are threatened by facts, we turn to unfalsifiable justifications

Post written by Christian Jarrett (@psych_writer) for the BPS Research Digest.

20 comments:

Research Digest said...

No doubt. A person diagnosed for depression is pretty much on their own. People say, 'get over it'. Or, go for a walk. I was that way until I finally suffered for it. Now I know.

Research Digest said...

I to was the same way Idaho, yet i still lack anykind of faith in psychology. Especially with new studys linking other physical ailments to depression.
Psychology is like philosophy, its good at offering questions, but has yet to offer answers.
Hard science such as psychiatry look to answer the questions provided by psychology, so both are needed right now, but in time(perhaps a short time) the evidance and cures will come from psychology.

Research Digest said...

For a similar result (which has been replicated), see Deena Weisberg et al 2008 "The Seductive Allure of Neuroscientific Explanations".

Research Digest said...

You could be right. I have found my best remedies are jogging, reading, and just saying hello to everyone. I also have quit reading political crap. I was a Republican, but have switched to a Libertarian. Life is what you make it. Most of us are pretty lucky. Cheers....

Research Digest said...

I used to be more than happy to search out this internet-site.I wished to thanks in your time for this glorious learn!! I positively having fun with each little little bit of it and I’ve you bookmarked to take a look at new stuff you weblog post.

sarana303

Research Digest said...

You have covered all points in this Article.This article is simple awesome which provides extra knowledge also.Thanks for sharing such a great post with us.

sarana303

Research Digest said...

I think the admin of this web site is in fact working hard in support of his website, for the reason that here every stuff is quality based data.

sarana303

Research Digest said...

Based on this response, I'm guessing that you have studied neither psychology, psychiatry or philosophy, or if you have, your study has been only superficial.

Research Digest said...

It seems that you don't really understand science. What makes a field of study science is that it applies the scientific method to justify its findings. This is done in medicine, Chemistry physics psychiatry and psychology. This is what makes psychology a science, it applies the scientific method to justify its conclusions.

Research Digest said...

I imagine that people are aware that absolute facts are difficult to come by in some fields and interpretation and belief colour the views of psychiatrists as much as they do economists or social scientists. If the can see the data from neuroscience they we'll be right to give it more credence.

Research Digest said...

If I cain't see it, it ain't real. LOL!

Research Digest said...

thanks for u info
Judi Bola

Research Digest said...

this blog was pretty cool ! never seen a great blog like this before. im think im gonna share this to my friends. Agen Bola , SBOBET Online , Agen Casino Online , Agen Bola Tangkas

Research Digest said...

nice post
Judi Bola

Judi Bola

Research Digest said...

this blog was really great, never seen a great blog like this before..
Agen Bola
Judi Online
Judi Online
Agen Bola
Daftar Judi Online

Research Digest said...

This blog could be the inspiring blog I ever seen! thanks for sharing :)
sharing is sign of care :)
Judi Bola
Prediksi Bola
Judi Bola
elvistoplist
monclerjackedeutschland

Research Digest said...

this blog was pretty cool ! love it Judi Poker , Poker Online Indonesia , Poker Online Indonesia , Poker Online Indonesia , Poker Online Indonesia

Research Digest said...

this good post

agen casino online



thankyou for sharing

Research Digest said...

this the good website

situs poker terpercaya

thankyou for sharing :)

Research Digest said...

this blog was really great, never seen a great blog like this before.. good job ! Bola Tangkas , Agen Baccarat , Judi Online

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Google+