Thursday, 3 November 2011

Robert Sternberg: Understanding love

I have always solved my problems through psychology, but usually by creating my own theories rather than by using other people's theories. I was at a point in my life once in which I was in an intimate relationship that seemed not to be working as I once had hoped it would; but I could not quite figure out why. I did some reading on the psychology of love but the reading I did somehow did not adequately address the problems I was having. It was at this point that I started to think about the psychology of love. Exactly what is love and what are the elements that lead to success or failure? The result of my deliberations, building on work of others such as Ellen Berscheid, Elaine Hatfield, Zick Rubin, and George Levinger, was the triangular theory of love. According to this theory, love has three components - intimacy, passion, and commitment - and different combinations of the components yield different kinds of love. Intimacy alone is liking; passion alone is infatuated love; commitment alone is empty love; intimacy plus passion is romantic love; intimacy plus commitment is companionate love; passion plus commitment is fatuous love; and intimacy, passion, and commitment together constitute consummate or complete love. My colleagues and I later created scales to measure the components of love and published data showing the construct validity of the measurements. The theory, addressed to my own relationship, left me with a clear sense of what was not working. The relationship eventually ended. At this point in my life, I am fortunate to have the best marriage (to Karin Sternberg) one could possibly hope for, and after a long search, have found the consummate love I long sought.

--
Robert J. Sternberg is Provost and Senior Vice President and Professor of Psychology at Oklahoma State University. A leading authority on intelligence and creativity, he has also studied many other topics including love, and has written about 1300 journal articles, book chapters, and books.

Return to the main menu for Psychology to the Rescue

3 comments:

  1. I agree that many theories of love are inadequate to the job of "explaining love" to the user. I have found adult attachment thory does the best job of expaining love and making it user friendly. The triangular theory you are describing may describe, but does not appear to do more than show an increased elaboration of the structure- it does nothing to further what to do and it seems to me to further the notion that it is completely out of our control- we "fall in love" and it goes however it is going to go, (based on its tripartate structure) then it either continues or it ends.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous8:52 pm

    Leif has missed the point. Once one can see what the relationship is according to Sternberg's model, then one can do something about it - one hopes, jointly with one's partner. If not, then one can pursue another relationship which contains the seeds of all three components.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous10:50 pm

    For a very clear understanding of love that works and love that doesn't, try the book LOVE THAT WORKS: The Art and Science of Giving (Templeton Press, 2004).
    Bruce Brander

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Google+