Friday, 16 July 2010

Talking on a mobile phone, you're less likely to notice the unicycling clown

Countless studies have demonstrated that drivers talking on a mobile are slower to brake, less likely to stay in lane and more likely not to notice information and hazards. However, these studies have been criticised for their lack of realism. When people talk on their mobiles while driving in real life, they're usually in their own car, using their own mobile, perhaps in a familiar street environment, chatting to someone they know. By contrast, the lab studies usually involve car simulators, unfamiliar routes, phones and conversation partners.

Ira Hyman and colleagues at Western Washington University think a key reason for the adverse cognitive effects of talking on a mobile phone has to do with 'inattentional blindness' - the failure to notice new information in the environment. To circumvent the limitations of the car studies, they've performed a stripped-down, naturalistic study of people walking diagonally 375 feet across their university's Red Square. They noted whether people walking this popular route were talking on a mobile, listening to an iPod, talking with another person who was present, or just walking on their own without any distractions. When these individuals reached the other side of the square, the researchers asked them if they'd noticed the unicycling clown positioned strategically just to the side of the diagonal path. Their report dryly notes the rationale:
'Unicyclists are very rare on campus pathways and none of the authors have ever observed a unicycling clown on campus. Since the clown was unicycling near the walking path, this was clearly relevant to the task of safely navigating across Red Square (besides, you never know when a clown may throw a cream pie in your face).'
The take-home message was that of the 151 people who were monitored, the 24 who'd been chatting on a mobile were significantly less likely than the others to have noticed the unicycling clown - 25 per cent of phone users noticed him, compared with 51 per cent of people walking on their own, 61 per cent of music listeners and 71 per cent of people walking in pairs. The result provides further evidence that talking on a mobile phone induces inattentional blindness in a way that listening to music or talking to a person who is present does not (in fact, the company of another person who is present increased vigilance, an effect also found in driving simulator studies).

In an earlier part of this study, Hyman and her colleagues found that people crossing the Red Square while chatting on a phone tended to walk more slowly, to weave and to change directions more than other walkers, perhaps because of the effects of increased inattentional blindness.

Although talking on mobile phones while driving has been banned in many countries, many people continue to believe that they are unaffected by using their phone. This could be because by definition we're not aware of what we've missed. '...[I]ndividuals in our study who did not report seeing the unicycling clown were generally surprised that they missed him,' the researchers said. 'Unfortunately, when driving a car while talking on a cell phone, people may be unaware of what they are missing until it is too late.'
_________________________________

ResearchBlogging.orgHyman, I., Boss, S., Wise, B., McKenzie, K., & Caggiano, J. (2009). Did you see the unicycling clown? Inattentional blindness while walking and talking on a cell phone. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24 (5), 597-607 DOI: 10.1002/acp.1638

Post written by Christian Jarrett (@psych_writer) for the BPS Research Digest.

5 comments:

  1. Great article, it definitely shows what I already new. People who are distracted drivers, whether it's eating, drinking, or putting on makeup, are more likely to cause an accident. I didn't need a law to restrict my cell phone usage while driving. Even though many states now prohibit hand held usage of cell phones, there are still those people who blatently ignore the law and continue using them. If I'm not mistaken, didn't recent research also show that hands free cell phone devices did not lessen peoples' distractibility. Mahalo, Michael Milcetich

    ReplyDelete
  2. 'Unfortunately, when driving a car while talking on a cell phone, people may be unaware of what they are missing until it is too late.'

    unaware of what they are NOT SEEING until it is too late TO MISS IT WITH THEIR CAR

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's great article. However, I have a doubt that if driver is focusing on eating hamburger, the result will be same or not?

    As some countries prohibit driver to use cellphone when driving, but I think sometimes eating habit should be concerned also.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great article, it definitely shows what I already n

    ew
    Unfortunately, when driving a car while talking on a cell phone, people may be unaware of what they are missing until it is too late.'

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'd love someone to do research into a phenomenon I've noticed in myself. When talking on a mobile phone around the house, I can seem almost "blind" to the world around me. If I try to recall what I've seen (I tend to wander around while talking) I can catch my brain filling in blanks with imagination.

    However, if I take a call on the landline on a wireless handset, I don't get the same effect. When talking on the landline and wandering around I seem more able to engage with the environment and complete tasks in parallel (make a cup of tea etc) where as with the mobile I seem much more focused on the single task of conversing.

    Since noticing this, the effect seems quite pronounced but could be observer bias now.

    I first noticed this effect when answering a mobile in a loud pub and wanding around trying to hear the other person I only realised after the call how I had been randomly walking arround basically shouting in peoples faces sat at otter tables unable to rationally think "I should go outside where it's quiet"

    So, is there something inherent in mobile phone technology that is even more effective (in some people?) in making them conciously unaware of their surroundings?

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Google+