Wednesday, 28 July 2010

Football fouls more likely to be given when play heads left

A simple perceptual bias could influence football referees' judgements about whether a foul occurred or not. That's according to Alexander Kranjec and colleagues, who had 12 football players at the University of Pennsylvania look for half a second each at 268 static images of one player tackling another and decide whether a foul had been committed. Unbeknown to the participants, 134 of the pictures were simply mirror opposites of the other 134.

The key finding was that more fouls (66.5 vs. 63.3 - a statistically significant difference) were judged to have occurred when assessing the images in which movement was captured in a leftward direction than when assessing the same images mirror-reversed and therefore featuring implied rightward motion. The researchers think this anomaly may have to do with our bias (at least in cultures that read from left to right) for rightward motion. Motion from right to left is perceived as less natural and this may be responsible for influencing judgements about fouls during play in that direction. Apparently film directors exploit this same bias by having villains arrive on-screen from the right.

Kranjec's team said their finding has implications for refereeing. The most popular system, known as the 'left diagonal refereeing system' (see picture), in which the referee runs a diagonal axis between the two left-hand corners of the pitch, results in the referee witnessing tackles in both goal areas primarily from a right-to-left perspective, thus making judgments of fouls in these areas more likely - an advantage to attackers. This is okay because it applies to both teams. What's important, Kranjec and colleagues warn, is that the referee doesn't switch to a 'right diagonal system' half-way through a match, potentially penalising a losing side that needs to attack yet no longer enjoys the benefits of this perceptual bias when playing in offensive areas.

'These results ... suggest that the effects of a low-level perceptual mechanisms could alter a decision, change the result of a game and perhaps, the fortunes of nations,' the researchers said.
_________________________________

ResearchBlogging.orgKranjec A, Lehet M, Bromberger B, & Chatterjee A (2010). A sinister bias for calling fouls in soccer. PloS one, 5 (7) PMID: 20628648

Post written by Christian Jarrett (@psych_writer) for the BPS Research Digest.

7 comments:

  1. Anonymous4:06 pm

    The researchers think this anomaly may have to do with our bias (at least in cultures that read from right to left) for rightward motion.

    I believe you meant to say left to right, right to left would be reading...well left.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You're right - thanks a lot for pointing that out!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Related post from Psyblog
    http://www.spring.org.uk/2009/06/why-left-to-right-punches-are-more-aggressive-powerful-and-shocking.php

    ReplyDelete
  4. This may also help to explain why some fouls are so hotly contested while others are not. Aside from all the obvious reasons why fans object to any foul their side receives, they may truly see a different play than the ref does. If the fans of the team objecting the ref's call on a particular play have the opposite perspective from the referee, they might see it as more or less offensive than the ref (depending, of course, on whether it's their team or the opponents receiving the call.)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Nora - that is a very good point.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous5:38 pm

    I do not know if a sampling of 12 soccer players is an adequate sample size for the results to be valid...

    ReplyDelete
  7. so if it's a culture thing, replicating the test with arabic speakers should give us the exact opposite result.

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Google+