Monday, 5 October 2009

Robert Sternberg: Career masochism

In psychology, you are rewarded (1) partly for the research you do, and (2) partly for (a) the topic on which you do the research and (b) the methods you use. The first point (1) is what you learn explicitly about throughout graduate school. The second point (2) you generally have to figure out for yourself as tacit knowledge. For example, suppose you want a good academic job. Then, with regard to (2), you should study something like (a) perception, attention, or memory using (b) fMRI methodology. You can be in lower (worse) percentiles of your cohort and you will still land a nice job. Suppose, though, that you study (a) intelligence, creativity, or wisdom using (b) individual-difference methodology. Good luck! So what I don’t understand is why I always choose both the less rewarded topics (2a) and methodologies (2b)! Am I a masochist or what?

Robert Sternberg is Dean of Tufts' School of Arts and Sciences and Professor of Psychology, Adjunct Professor of Education, and Director of the PACE (Psychology of Abilities, Competencies and Expertise) Center. In 2002 he was listed among the 100 most influential psychologists of the twentieth century by the Review of General Psychology.

--
Return to menu for One Nagging Thing.


Bookmark and Share

2 comments:

  1. Anonymous4:32 pm

    Wait, he's a dean and a full professor and he's complaining he's doing the wrong type of work to get a good academic job?

    ReplyDelete
  2. He's not complaining that he's doing the wrong type of work to get an academic job, far from it. What he's actually saying is, hey look at me I study the most elusive abstract topics in psychology and I'm very good at what I do!!!...top dog.

    He's also alluding to the fact that there are people out there researching away the softer 'in the moment' topics in psychology, that dont really broaden our understanding. But because these topics are currently being funded, they have more chance of gaining employment!!

    Robert Sternberg's work is very influential, he has a great and gifted mind, full of tacit knowledge!!, the difference between an average researcher and a great mind who gains a well deserved place on the "Most Influential Psychologists of the Twenteith Century" list.

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Google+